Seems the scuttlebutt on E3 is that exhibitors are pulling out, and that the show is going to condense to a no-exhibit-floor meeting-room-only affair, attracting only serious buyers.
Which, as is noted in this opinion, is probably bad news for smaller game makers.
For the record, E3 sold out its exhibits for 2006 - 540,000 sf in five halls of the LA Convention Center.
Things happen quickly, don't they?
Of course, this also begs the question, what will the E3 Girls do next?
UPDATE: Tim took the time to Digg this news - which turned up comments suggesting the original Next-Generation report might be a crock. Anyway, E3 has posted dates for next year, but no indication of having a regular show or a smaller one - although we'll note that in 2006 the combined conference/show went four days, not three. There's nothing on organizer ESA's site regarding this - but this might be a good time for them to speak up.
UPDATE #2: OK, it's true. E3 is going smaller - perhaps because the big four (Nintendo, Microsoft, Electronic Arts and Sony) acted together or independently and warned show management they would not be back. Rather than face the embarrassment of a Comdex/PC Expo/Internet World death spiral, ESA did its own preemptive strike.
What's it mean for other large shows? Maybe not a thing right now. Many non-tech events haven't experienced the disintermediation/market disruption that the tech shows have. Plus, there's an age/generational factor.
The large majority of SEMA, National Hardware Show and MAGIC attendees don't blog, don't have MySpace pages, don't visit Gizmodo and don't play WoW.
But when attendees at those shows begin doing those things, you'll see dramatic change in those events, too. And very quickly.
As Scoble notes, CES may be next. Or not.
Probably not.
Recent Comments